Very concerning that they try to censor criticism under the guise of ācopyright infringementā⦠shows how rotten the FED is and demonstrates the dangers of CBDCs!
Since the bot failed us, here’s the most important paragraphs:
>In a letter sent to the publication by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the central bank of the United States is claiming thatĀ Bitcoin Magazine merchandiseĀ that parodies its services are not protected speech, but rather an unauthorized infringement of its image and trademarks.
>The dispute centers around the use of the FedNow Service image and trademark in a line of merchandise sold by Bitcoin Magazine that seeks to criticize the surveillance capabilities of the FedNow system, and how it threatens American civil liberties.
And Bitcoin Magazine’s “defense” is basically “we have a right to use your logo because you suck, also fuck you”.
I don’t see the magazine winning this one in court š
>āThe Federal Reserve recently learned that Bitcoin Magazine is selling t-shirts, hats, and other wearables bearing the FEDNOW name, as shown in the screenshot below. Bitcoin Magazineās use of the FEDNOW mark in this manner is likely to cause confusion, mistakes or deception. Consumers are likely to believe that the gear is associated with, affiliated with, or endorsed by the Federal Reserve, when no such association or relationship exists.ā
If the Federal Reserve have that name trademarked (meaning itās registered with the US Trademark Office) and Bitcoin Magazine used it to sell an item, regardless if the item contains satirical or parody influences, they could be in DEEP shit.
Sueing is the first step of recognizing the danger to the old System
Very concerning that they try to censor criticism under the guise of ācopyright infringementā⦠shows how rotten the FED is and demonstrates the dangers of CBDCs!
tldr; The article does not provide any relevant text for the given title.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Since the bot failed us, here’s the most important paragraphs:
>In a letter sent to the publication by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the central bank of the United States is claiming thatĀ Bitcoin Magazine merchandiseĀ that parodies its services are not protected speech, but rather an unauthorized infringement of its image and trademarks.
>The dispute centers around the use of the FedNow Service image and trademark in a line of merchandise sold by Bitcoin Magazine that seeks to criticize the surveillance capabilities of the FedNow system, and how it threatens American civil liberties.
And Bitcoin Magazine’s “defense” is basically “we have a right to use your logo because you suck, also fuck you”.
I don’t see the magazine winning this one in court š
I think FED should sue all anon-made meme with Powel printing brrrrrrrrrrr!
>āThe Federal Reserve recently learned that Bitcoin Magazine is selling t-shirts, hats, and other wearables bearing the FEDNOW name, as shown in the screenshot below. Bitcoin Magazineās use of the FEDNOW mark in this manner is likely to cause confusion, mistakes or deception. Consumers are likely to believe that the gear is associated with, affiliated with, or endorsed by the Federal Reserve, when no such association or relationship exists.ā
They want their share.
These are the desperate actions of a dying system, another nail in the coffin of fiat and corrupt government.
I think people should start printing their own shirt with the same designs.
If the Federal Reserve have that name trademarked (meaning itās registered with the US Trademark Office) and Bitcoin Magazine used it to sell an item, regardless if the item contains satirical or parody influences, they could be in DEEP shit.